When I began my writing career (if you can call it that at this point) I have to admit I was confused about when to use "was" or "were." I had always written "was" in such sentences as "if it was me, I'd do such and such." Now, I know that's wrong. It should read "if it were me, ...."
I've had to learn the difference. Someone once tried to explain it to me.
Use "was" when it is a statement of fact, as in "the bell tower 'was' 120 feet tall."
Use "were" when the fact has not been determined. "If he 'were' to climb the bell tower, he would find it 'was' 120 feet tall."
Clear as mud?
Actually, pretty clear. That's one of those rules that I know, but if I had to explain it, I'd just confuse the heck out of people.
ReplyDeleteIt used to be a big problem for me too. I never understood it until Bob Farley explained it to me.
ReplyDeleteYeah, he's the one who made me realize just how bad my grammar was. Did me a huge favor.
ReplyDeleteMy life has meaning! LOL. The term for that verb usage is "subjunctive." I think that's a word made up by a sadistic English teacher who didn't think the language was quite confusing enough. Or is it were?
ReplyDeleteLOLOLOLOL!!! Now, I'm confused again, Bob. Thanks loads.
ReplyDeletethat's English for you...
ReplyDeleteThank you! This will make my life easier.
ReplyDeleteGlad to be of help, and welcome to my blog site. I'm always glad to have a new reader/commenter.
ReplyDeleteWow, thank you!
ReplyDeleteI've been grappling with the difference for a while, but now... I understand!
Quite magical, if you ask me. ;D
Now all is clear, many thanks for the information.
ReplyDelete